Home   Sittingbourne   News   Article

Gladman Developments lodge appeal with Planning Inspectorate over new homes off Otterham Quay Lane

An appeal has been lodged with the Planning Inspectorate after plans to build 74 homes on pear orchards were refused.

Gladman Developments Ltd wanted permission for the proposals between Lower Rainham Road and Otterham Quay Lane, near Upchurch.

The 74 homes were planned to be built off Otterham Quay Lane. Picture: Swale Council
The 74 homes were planned to be built off Otterham Quay Lane. Picture: Swale Council

But Swale Borough Council refused the application earlier this year, saying it would harm the environment and residents would rely too much on cars.

The decision, published on May 24, added: "The proposed development would fail to protect the intrinsic value, tranquillity and beauty of the countryside by virtue of its location."

It also stated there was not a "completed S106 agreement to secure relevant contributions" and the development failed "to mitigate the impacts of the additional residential units on local services and infrastructure".

There were plans to retain the green space on 60% of the site, with allotments, orchard planting and a children's play area.

The proposal also included widening and upgrading an existing roundabout south of the site, which borders Upchurch River Valley Golf Club.

As the application was refused, Gladman Developments has now submitted an appeal to the planning inspectorate this month and requested a public inquiry.

In a report published in June, it said the scheme would deliver new homes "at the right place and at the right time to meet market and affordable housing need".

It also stated although it understands the issues of access only being via car, it has evidence amenities, workplaces, schools and stations are within walking and cycling distance.

In response to the council's concerns over the lack of a Section 106, the Cheshire firm said it would attempt to reach an agreement with the local authority.

The original plans received 71 letters of objections but the company has said it will address the concerns raised by explaining they are "unfounded" or can be suitably mitigated in planning.

An appeal decision is expected by February 17.

Close This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.Learn More