More than 1,500 people in Gravesham have already been moved to a Universal Credit system amid concerns over whether they will have less money, new figures show.

The Labour Party claimed this week that the new scheme, which has also been hit by delays ahead of a complete rollout, is a “vehicle for cuts”, and said it was “causing immense hardship”.

Department for Work and Pension figures show that 1,508 benefit claimants in Gravesham had been moved onto the new Universal Credit system by last month.

It is more than double the number of people enrolled on it in September 2017.

Reports last week have suggested that the rollout of the Government’s flagship welfare change is now not expected to be fully operational until the end of 2023.

It was originally due to be up and running by April 2017.

Under the scheme, six different types of benefits are being rolled into one monthly payment, including jobseeker’s allowance and working tax credit.

Of those who had been moved to the scheme in Gravesham last month, 33% were in employment.

Speaking in the House of Commons, shadow work and pensions secretary, Margaret Greenwood, said that 3.2 million families with children could lose around £50 a week under Universal Credit.

She added: “Universal Credit, the Government’s flagship social security programme, has been beset with flaws in its design and delivery.

“It’s causing immense hardship for many people wherever it is rolled out.

“It is hard to believe now, but Universal Credit was designed to lift people out of poverty and smooth the transition into work to ensure that it always pays. The reality is that Universal Credit is a vehicle for cuts.”

Ms Greenwood said that confusion about the transfer between benefit systems was causing real concern for families, and leaving some facing “hunger and destitution”.

Work and Pensions Secretary Esther McVey said that the rollout of Universal Credit would continue.

She said: “We will make sure we get this benefit right. You know for why? Because the genuine concerns of the people on our backbenches want to get it right.”

She added that disabled households would be £110 better off through Universal Credit, as she defended the Government’s approach.