More on KentOnline
Home Kent Business County news Article
Louise Worton from the Dispute Resolution Team of Kings Hill-based solicitors Vertex Law examines the implications of the Corporate Manslaughter Act.
Many work-related fatalities which occurred after the Act came into force last year are under investigation and the Crown Prosecution Services estimates that as many as 13 cases under the Act may be brought each year.
In the past, organisations could only be convicted of manslaughter if a 'directing mind' at the top of the management tree was also personally liable. This was often difficult to prove as companies commonly delegate responsibility for safety matters between more than one director and manager.
The new Act is intended to make it easier to secure convictions against organisations where the way in which its activities are managed or organised by senior management causes a person's death.
The death must be the result of a gross breach of a relevant duty of care owed by the organisation to the deceased and the way in which senior management managed or organised the organisation's activities must be a substantial element of that breach. Duties of care owed by the organisation to individuals will usually arise in a health and safety context, although could arise in other ways, e.g. under environmental law requirements.
There must also be shown to be a "gross breach" of this duty of care. This means conduct which falls far below what can reasonably be expected of the organisation in the circumstances.
Organisations are now judged on the way that their activities are organised and managed as a whole, so the scope for falling foul of the new legislation is much broader. The responsibilities on mid-level managers are much greater as their actions have the potential to result in a prosecution against the organisation, and individuals continue to be liable under the common law offence of manslaughter by gross negligence and existing health and safety legislation. The company can also still be prosecuted for any breaches of health and safety or other laws.
As the Act is still in its infancy it is not known how the courts will interpret its provisions. It is likely to be the subject of judicial clarification. How and to what extent parent companies will be liable for the actions of their subsidiaries might also be a topic for future judicial pronouncement. It is anticipated that they will only be liable if their own management failures were a cause of death.
Organisations found guilty of corporate manslaughter face an unlimited fine.
The Sentencing Guidelines Council (SGC) has produced guidelines which are subject to a period of consultation. These suggest there will inevitably be a range of fines because of the range of seriousness of offences and the differences in the circumstances of the defendants.
Fines are to be punitive and of a size to have a significant impact on the guilty defendant and various aggravating and mitigating factors will be taken into account. The SGC suggests that the appropriate fine will seldom be less than £500,000 and may be measured in millions of pounds.
The court may also order the organisation to remedy the management failure that caused the death or to publicise the conviction. Failure to comply with either order is a criminal offence punishable by an unlimited fine.
Companies may also face civil penalties in the form of compensation payable to the victim's family.
What can you do to protect your organisation?
Key steps that organisations can take to reduce the risk of prosecution under the Act include:
For advice contact Louise Worton at Vertex Law on 01732 224000.