KentOnline

bannermobile

News

Sport

Business

What's On

Advertise

Contact

Other KM sites

CORONAVIRUS WATCH KMTV LIVE SIGN UP TO OUR NEWSLETTERS LISTEN TO OUR PODCASTS LISTEN TO KMFM
SUBSCRIBE AND SAVE
National

Sir Patrick Vallance rejects Sunak claim scientists were empowered during Covid

By: PA News

Published: 22:35, 20 November 2023

Updated: 22:40, 20 November 2023

Rishi Sunak said last year that scientists were too ’empowered’ during the pandemic (Jane Barlow/PA)

Sir Patrick Vallance has hit back at Rishi Sunak’s suggestion that scientists were too “empowered” during the Covid-19 pandemic.

The former chief scientific adviser rebuffed that idea, in his witness statement to the Covid-19 Inquiry.

The Prime Minister made the remarks in an interview with The Spectator during last summer’s Tory leadership contest.

“We shouldn’t have empowered the scientists in the way we did.

Like many others I received abuse and threats and I was concerned for the wellbeing and safety of my family
Sir Patrick Vallance

“And you have to acknowledge trade-offs from the beginning. If we’d done all of that, we could be in a very different place,” he told the magazine.

mpu1

Sir Patrick, responding to an inquiry question about whether decision-makers relied too heavily on Sage scientists, said: “It is unclear to me what empowerment is being referred to.

“Science advisers advise and ministers decide. We provided science advice and it was for ministers to take policy decisions.

“Sage scientists very clearly identified that there would be detriments to imposing stringent behavioural and social interventions, including economic detriments.

“I was among those who suggested forming an equivalent group to provide independent economic advice.

“My understanding is that HM Treasury did not wish to do that.”

Elsewhere, in the 241-page witness statement, Sir Patrick said that there were times during the crisis that he considering resigning.

mpu2

He told the inquiry that he “certainly found the pressure” on himself and his family “difficult”.

“Like many others I received abuse and threats and I was concerned for the wellbeing and safety of my family.

“At times those factors did lead me to question whether I should continue.

“I also found people breaking the lockdown rules very difficult and considered what I should do in response, but decided that I would help most by continuing with my job.”

Read more

More by this author

sticky

© KM Group - 2024