Home   News   National   Article

NI political leaders hold ‘robust’ talks with Lewis on legacy plans

PA News

Northern Ireland’s political leaders have held “robust conversations” with Secretary of State Brandon Lewis over controversial Government plans to ban prosecutions over Troubles-related offences.

The parties outlined their opposition to the proposals in a virtual meeting with Mr Lewis, which also included Irish Foreign Minister Simon Coveney.

The meeting came as it was confirmed the Northern Ireland Assembly will be recalled next week from its summer recess to discuss concerns over what politicians and victims have described as a “de facto amnesty” for Troubles crimes.

Mr Lewis said on Wednesday that he intends to introduce legislation to create a proposed statute of limitations which would end all prosecutions for incidents up to April 1998 and would apply to military veterans as well as ex-paramilitaries.

The proposals, which Prime Minister Boris Johnson said would allow Northern Ireland to “draw a line under the Troubles”, would also end all legacy inquests and civil actions related to the conflict.

Following the meeting on Friday, DUP leader Sir Jeffrey Donaldson said: “It was a fairly robust conversation. Each of us outlined our views on the way forward in relation to legacy.

“We recognise that these are very difficult and sensitive matters.

“This morning I have been meeting with some of the groups here representing innocent victims from across Northern Ireland. They are very concerned by the Government’s proposals for what they believe amounts to some form of amnesty.

“They believe passionately that the opportunity for victims and families to pursue justice should not be closed off and that view was replicated in the comments made by party leaders this morning.”

SDLP leader Colum Eastwood described the Government legacy plans as an ‘amnesty’ (Liam McBurney/PA)
SDLP leader Colum Eastwood described the Government legacy plans as an ‘amnesty’ (Liam McBurney/PA)

SDLP leader Colum Eastwood said that Mr Johnson and Mr Lewis “cannot be given a free run to impose their plans to award amnesties to those involved in serious Troubles-related crimes”.

The Foyle MP said: “There is a strong consensus among party leaders that the British Government proposal for an amnesty for those involved in serious conflict-related crimes cannot be allowed to proceed. It represents a gross distortion of the structures agreed by most parties during the Stormont House Agreement and abandons the needs of victims and survivors.

“It is pathetic that Boris Johnson and Brandon Lewis pushed ahead with this announcement before the consultation and engagement process with political parties and victims had begun in any serious way. This process cannot have a predetermined outcome that fails to deliver truth, justice, accountability and acknowledgment that victims and survivors need.

Sinn Fein MLA Gerry Kelly said the British Government was bringing forward a ‘fait accompli’ (David Young/PA)
Sinn Fein MLA Gerry Kelly said the British Government was bringing forward a ‘fait accompli’ (David Young/PA)

Sinn Fein MLA Gerry Kelly accused the British Government of trying to bring forward a “fait accompli”.

“If you have been listening to this for the past 48 hours I doubt if you can tell me one person outside of Brandon Lewis who has actually defended this. Everyone is against it, right across the sector.

“Nobody believes what the British Government are saying, they are talking about a process and nobody believes that there is a process, they believe that the British (Government) are trying to bring forward a fait accompli and what we need to do is to fight it.”

Naomi Long said she would not “provide cover for an amnesty” (Liam McBurney/PA)
Naomi Long said she would not “provide cover for an amnesty” (Liam McBurney/PA)

Alliance Party leader Naomi Long said her party would not “provide cover for anything” that amounts to an “amnesty” over Troubles prosecutions.

Mrs Long said: “Alliance was clear with the governments that we will continue to engage in the legacy process in order to find a solution. But that solution needs to be based on the rule of law and due process.

“However, we will not provide cover for anything that amounts to an amnesty. I was clear in the meeting this process has to be centred on victims, who have been re-traumatised this week thanks to the actions of the UK Government.”

UUP leader Doug Beattie said the meeting with Government ‘did not provide any solutions’ for victims (Liam McBurney/PA)
UUP leader Doug Beattie said the meeting with Government ‘did not provide any solutions’ for victims (Liam McBurney/PA)

Ulster Unionist leader Doug Beattie said the meeting “did not provide any solutions for innocent victims”.

Mr Beattie said: “I made clear at the meeting that we would not be supporting a statute of limitations, which has always been our consistent position because it was always going to inevitably lead to an amnesty for terrorists.

“The UK Government must widen their proposals to incorporate a criminal justice element or they will risk inflicting more pain on innocent victims whose families have already sacrificed so much.”

Taoiseach Micheal Martin said there had to be consensus around legacy in Northern Ireland (Liam McBurney/PA)
Taoiseach Micheal Martin said there had to be consensus around legacy in Northern Ireland (Liam McBurney/PA)

Irish Taoiseach Micheal Martin said there has to be a “consensus-based approach”.

He said: “What is at the foremost of our minds at all times must be the victims and their families.

“They feel betrayed and they feel let down, and we have to prioritise the families and victims of so many atrocities during that period of our history on this island, irrespective of one’s community.

“It’s very clear people want those that murdered their loved ones, be it paramilitaries, should be fully accountable to the justice system, fully acknowledging the challenges around that.”

Stormont is to be recalled on Tuesday after more than 30 MLAs signed a recall petition introduced by the SDLP.

MLAs will debate a motion calling for victims and survivors to have a “full, material and central role and input into the content and design of structures to address the legacy of the past”.


Close This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.Learn More