Rishi Sunak must sometimes think that someone, somewhere, must be out to get him.

His expectation of a quiet, less frenetic week has been blown apart by what politicians describe as ‘events’ - in the sense of events that have arisen when least anticipated.

He has what is sometimes referred to as a ‘challenging’ few days ahead, not least because of the febrile debate over his Rwanda plan, with MPs seeming to split into two different factions.

It seems bizarre to even suggest it but events have turned in such a dramatic way that his ‘get tough’ approach to asylum seekers and the enactment of his controversial asylum Bill have failed to placate his foes.

And here’s the dilemma: critics on one side say the bill does not go far enough; and on the other side of the debate, it is claimed it goes too far.

On top of that, there is the ongoing debate over legal migration and the numbers the UK should accept.

Criticism here is focused on some of the measures that could act as a deterrent to people who might fill vacancies, notably in the care sector.

“Politics is becoming a bit like premiership football: lose a few games and questions will be asked about whether you are fit for the job...”

As a prelude to crucial votes on asylum seekers and the Rwanda Bill, the PM also faces an uncomfortable inquisition over his role in the Covid-19 pandemic and “Eat Out” initiative.

The convergence of these issues in one week - not forgetting today’s breaking story about asylum processing facilities at Manston and Dover - will test his resilience.

And if he is seen to have failed on that test, might it take him to the point of no return?

Politics is becoming a bit like premiership football: lose a few games and questions will be asked about whether you are fit for the job.

But the sacking of a political leader has different consequences, and switching leaders within a year since the last does not instill great faith in the party.

It brings to mind the refrain uttered by Corporal Jones in the comedy Dad’s Army when his clarion call “don’t panic” had just the opposite effect.