KentOnline

bannermobile

News

Sport

Business

What's On

Advertise

Contact

Other KM sites

CORONAVIRUS WATCH KMTV LIVE SIGN UP TO OUR NEWSLETTERS LISTEN TO OUR PODCASTS LISTEN TO KMFM
SUBSCRIBE AND SAVE
News

The Happy Pants Ranch at Bobbing could face prosecution if noisy animals are not kept quiet

By: Chloe Holmwood cholmwood@thekmgroup.co.uk

Published: 06:00, 19 July 2021

Updated: 15:22, 19 July 2021

The boss of a sanctuary has been given an ultimatum – hush up her animals in the next 90 days or face prosecution.

Amey James, the founder of The Happy Pants Ranch at Bobbing, near Sittingbourne, has been issued with official abatement notices by Swale council.

Founder Amey James speaking after the written warning in April

She was first given a written warning back in April ordering her to stop “allowing animals on the land to make an unreasonable level of noise”.

It specifically referred to the ranch’s 20 geese and 50 cockerels, and a generator on the site. The charity was told, at the time, it faced being slapped with a fine of up to £2,500.

mpu1

However, the charity has now been given a timescale to stop the noise, which also now includes sheep, cattle and dogs, or it could be prosecuted and handed an unlimited fine.

Amey, 37, said: “It’s just so upsetting. Now it’s basically all of the animals that are an issue, and I don’t know how they expect me to sort this out – how can we soundproof cows?

“We’ll either have to leave the site or re-home the animals; it’s just awful.

Amey James, founder of the animal sanctuary at Bobbing

“It all seems so wrong and I cannot believe it’s continuing.”

She added: “If you can’t keep animals here, on a 20-acre field, in the countryside, in a non-residential area, then where can you keep them?”

“For many people who visit and volunteer at the sanctuary, it’s a place of peace and harmony; that’s why those with mental health issues find it such good therapy here.”

Amey, who lives at the ranch with her boyfriend Phil Greenhalgh, 32, said that after the written warning the charity blacked out the windows of the cockerel barns, to keep them from crowing at sunrise, tried to encourage the geese to use a pond further away from neighbours, and put the generator in a shed to try and soundproof it.

mpu2

But, as the charity has since had to apply for permission for the field, registered for agricultural use, to be used as a sanctuary, it has not been able to make any further changes.

A cow at Happy Pants

“We wanted to rehouse the cockerels and we’d like to put a new, soundproofed shed up for the generator, but we’re not allowed to build any structures until permission is granted,” Amey said.

She added: “We’ve already appealed the decision; I just think it’s unfair.

“No evidence has been presented to us, showing what the noise nuisance is or at what times it’s happening, so we haven’t been able to assess and act on it properly.

“I also feel let down by the lack of communication from the council. That’s twice now that they’ve turned up and given me a piece of paper, but they’ve not given me any advice on how to sort this out.”

The noise complaints came after the rescue centre – a sanctuary for 350 unwanted or abandoned animals from cows, dogs, ducks and sheep to goats, parrots, pigs and more – moved from its previous base at Yelsted to the new site earlier this year.

The entrance to the ranch at Bobbing

“I never envisaged having trouble like this,” Amey said. “It just makes you feel so uncomfortable as soon as one of the animals makes a noise and that’s not right.

“I just feel like there’s very little that I’m able to do.”

Swale council confirmed it had issued noise abatement notices on the sanctuary site as its investigations into a number of complaints determined there was a statutory noise nuisance.

The notices require the charity to remedy the noise from the generator within 28 days, and the daily noise from animals including cockerels, geese, sheep, cattle and dogs within 90 days.

A spokesman said: “We recognise this is a sensitive matter and, as such, we have given an extended timescale for the owners to abate the animal noise nuisance.

Cockerels were among the original culprits for noise, but now other animals have been added to the list

“We will, of course, support the owners where we can but once we have determined that the noise levels were in excess of what can be reasonably expected for a given location, then we are required by law to act.

“Throughout the investigation we have offered to work with the site operator to resolve the situation, and this remains the case going forward.

“Failure to comply with the notices can lead to prosecution and magistrates can give an unlimited fine.”

Read more!

Escaped animals, unusual finds and news from the RSPCA can all be found here.

Read more: All the latest news from Sittingbourne

More by this author

sticky

© KM Group - 2024