KentOnline

bannermobile

News

Sport

Business

What's On

Advertise

Contact

Other KM sites

CORONAVIRUS WATCH KMTV LIVE SIGN UP TO OUR NEWSLETTERS LISTEN TO OUR PODCASTS LISTEN TO KMFM
SUBSCRIBE AND SAVE
News

East Kent Hospitals baby deaths: Investigation finds trust was slow at resolving 'recurrent safety risks'

By: Joe Wright jwright@thekmgroup.co.uk

Published: 14:56, 08 April 2020

Updated: 15:06, 08 April 2020

A damning report has revealed a hospital trust was "inappropriately slow" at addressing frequent safety concerns on its maternity wards.

A probe into East Kent Hospitals was launched by the Healthcare Safety Investigations Branch (HSIB) following a series of baby deaths, including the "wholly avoidable" case of one-week-old Harry Richford.

The William Harvey in Ashford

The thorough examination found "recurrent safety risks" in 24 cases.

HSIB started its investigation in July 2018 and raised concerns to the trust after discovering widespread problems.

Resuscitation equipment was found to be located in incorrect areas, and questions over staff failures to spot signs of deterioration in health were raised.

mpu1

The report states: "The location of resuscitation equipment added delay, risk and distress to critical situations and staff responsible for resuscitation were often under supported by appropriately skilled colleagues.

"Deterioration in the condition of mothers and babies had occurred in several cases because staff had not recognised the signs and symptoms that indicate deterioration.

Sarah and Tom Richford with baby Harry before he died

"As a consequence, clinical interventions that could have prevented further deterioration were missed."

Risks found at maternity wards:

The HSIB says it "engaged frequently" with the trust to present evidence of continued patient concerns.

But despite repeatedly raising concerns, investigators "continued to observe the same risks occurring" at the William Harvey hospital in Ashford and the QEQM hospital in Margate.

'HSIB considers the trust’s early response was inappropriately slow...'

As a result, the trust was asked to refer itself to its Clinical Commissioning Group and the Care Quality Commission watchdog.

The report states: "HSIB considers the trust’s early response was inappropriately slow given the evidence of ongoing patient safety risks and the safety recommendations made.

"The evidence of recurrent and unaddressed safety risks progressively emerged during investigations for the first 10 referred cases. HSIB first raised these particular concerns with the trust in December 2018.

mpu2

Following repeated calls for action across a number of months, the HSIB says the trust eventually improved its engagement after the involvement of senior clinical teams.

The better communication has led to the implementation of interventions to resolve the safety flaws.

To keep up-to-date with all the latest developments with your local hospitals and other health stories, click here.

More by this author

sticky

© KM Group - 2024