Home   Thanet   News   Article

Thanet District Council’s £100 fines for swearing in Margate, Birchington, Ramsgate and Broadstairs divide residents

“Draconian” new council powers allowing enforcement officers to dish out £100 fines for swearing have left residents divided.

Thanet District Council’s (TDC) public space protection order (PSPO), will cover the entire towns of Birchington, Margate, Ramsgate and Broadstairs - highlighted as "hot spots” for abusive behaviour.

But locals are split on whether the restrictions - which can also be enforced by police - will help or hinder the community, with some insisting the right to free speech is most important.

Harry Stevens, 16, said: “I think as long as you’re not using bad language to try and be abusive, it should be okay.

“If you’re out with friends just having a laugh and it’s not that deep, then a £100 fine is a bit harsh.”

Longtime Ramsgate resident Anna added: “I think it’s a bad idea because freedom of speech is very important.

“Some people may have a very limited vocabulary to express themselves. Sometimes people have a bad day; sometimes they just need to blast.”

Harry Stevens, 16, from Ramsgate, thinks the new council rules about offensive language could be overly harsh in some situations
Harry Stevens, 16, from Ramsgate, thinks the new council rules about offensive language could be overly harsh in some situations

The order states: “All persons are prohibited from using foul or abusive language in such a manner that is loud and can be heard by others and cause either alarm or distress to any other person in any public place.”

Pensioner Lynn Nichols says she has witnessed antisocial behaviour in Ramsgate town centre on multiple occasions and backs any council initiative to crack down on it.

She said: “I think it’s a good idea. We always get a lot of trouble in the evening, especially with young people congregating in groups.

“Not all young people are like that but some can be really disrespectful.

“Free speech is free speech but that shouldn’t include being abusive to people, horrible behaviour or swearing.”

Ramsgate local Lynn Nichols, 73, supports the council's effort to crack down on anti-social behaviour in Thanet’s town centres
Ramsgate local Lynn Nichols, 73, supports the council's effort to crack down on anti-social behaviour in Thanet’s town centres

Birchington resident Andrew Thwaites, 63, said: “I think it’s fair enough. If people are making a nuisance of themselves then they should be fined.”

Debating the new rules at a TDC cabinet meeting on July 25, Cllr Rebecca Wing said she too had seen bad behaviour in her Ramsgate ward.

But the Green Party councillor also questioned how effectively the PSPO would be enforced.

“Ramsgate feels really unsafe at the moment,” said Cllr Wing.

“I was on York Street one Sunday evening at half past four, walking my dog, and a group of street drinkers ended up having a punch-up.

Andrew Thwaites, 63, from Birchington supports the new PSPO, saying trouble-makers deserve to be punished
Andrew Thwaites, 63, from Birchington supports the new PSPO, saying trouble-makers deserve to be punished

“It just feels as if they don't give two damns about the PSPO.

“The police have told us they won't enforce it. That's what they've told us.

“That's what a policeman out on the street said, ‘We won't give fines to this group because they're not payable’, which makes the whole thing pointless.”

The new PSPO came into effect on Wednesday, July 31, and will be in place for one year.

But activist group Free Speech Union has threatened to legally challenge the council’s new rule, which it sees as an “unreasonable and probably unlawful” restriction on the fundamental human right to freedom of expression.

York Street in Ramsgate town centre has become locally known for anti-social behaviour. Picture: Google
York Street in Ramsgate town centre has become locally known for anti-social behaviour. Picture: Google

A spokesperson said: “For example, the PSPO prohibits ‘causing a disturbance to others’ - this has clear implications for lawful protest.

“The blanket ban on any behaviour that is ‘likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress’ is a draconian measure that is wide open to abuse

“It may be that the council only intends to enforce the PSPO in certain cases of legitimately anti-social conduct.

“But they had a duty to make the order itself clear about what those cases are.

“It is contrary to the rule of law to leave criminal sanctions entirely at the whim of enforcement officers based on vague and ill-defined prohibitions.

“We have sent TDC a letter before claim - a formal warning putting them on notice that legal proceedings may be commenced unless they take immediate action to rescind their unjust and oppressive order.

“We also stand ready to assist any local resident in Thanet who is worried about being punished by their local council for exercising their free speech rights, and encourage them to get in touch.”

TDC says signs will be placed around the enforcement areas to educate residents about the new restrictions.

The penalty for breaking the PSPO is £100 to be paid within 28 days but is reduced to £60 if paid within 14 days.

Labour councillor Heather Keen said: “Antisocial behaviour can have a detrimental effect on people’s enjoyment of the place where they live if it isn’t dealt with. It can also spoil the experience of visitors and holidaymakers.

“We know that making Thanet a safer and cleaner place to live in, work in or visit is a top priority for residents, and this new PSPO is a positive step towards this ambition.”

Close This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.Learn More